Meet the Team
1. Could you tell us a little bit about your professional background?
I am a Research Director at the Institute for Molecular Medicine (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Finland, and was Professor of Genetic Epidemiology at the University of Helsinki since 2001until mandatory retirement in April 2020. I held a five-year research professorship fully funded by the Academy of Finland from 2013 to 2017. The Academy Professorship research theme was on genetics, epigenetics and epidemiology of smoking and nicotine dependence. Furthermore, I was Director of FIMM from October 2015 to January 2018. FIMM is an European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)-associated biomedical research institute focusing on personalized cancer therapies, large-scale genetics studies such as FinnGen, and use of AI in digital pathology. I have worked in genetic epidemiology with a focus on risk factors of non-communicable disease, especially smoking and alcohol use and dependence. Since 1976, I have been working with the Finnish Twin Cohort studies, and with other population-based samples in Finland. I engaged in extensive international collaborations, including multiple NIH and EU funded projects, and have served as President of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco European chapter, as President of the Behavior Genetics Association and as President of the International Society for Twin Studies. Furthermore, I have been active in cancer and tobacco-related NGOs in Finland. During my career, I have supervised over 50 PhD students, and have authored 1,438 papers listed in PubMed, with a Web of Science h-index of 149.
2. What is your role in PSY-PGx?
Together with co-lead Allan Young I lead WP4 on Biobanks. The aim is to obtain real-world data from UK and Finnish biobanks with genetic data to assess pharmacogenetic genotype and clinical outcome in patients with mood, anxiety or psychotic disorders. I have the responsibility for providing the Finnish biobank data to the project.
3. Which aspect of your work do you enjoy the most, or you find particularly fascinating?
I have always enjoyed hands-on data analysis, the joy of seeing new results for the first time. Sometimes, mostly often, they are as expected, but every now and then something unexpected turns up. Then I need to consider all the reasons for why the unexpected result is probably erroneous, and only after excluding those, can one begin to consider the implications of the novel result. Nowadays the process is often with PhD students and post-docs, but I continue to actively handle data, run analyses and summarize the results for myself and co-authors.
4. In an ideal world, how do you envision mental health care to look like?
Mental health care is an important aspect of public health and of the health of communities, nations and globally. At the moment there are aspects of mental health where we could and should apply preventive measures. For example, we would ideally want to prevent trauma of all kinds – from interpersonal, physical, sexual and environmental causes. Likewise, the use of many psychoactive substances leads to the development of addictions in many but not all users – ideally we would want to prevent and treat addictions effectively, since collectively they form the greatest burden of psychiatric disorders in society. Even more ideally, we would not need mental health care, as everyone would be mentally and physically healthy throughout life. Unfortunately, we are still far from that very ideal state, though life-expectancy has increased dramatically in a very short time (since the 1800s). Many may challenge the possibility of ever achieving these idealistic goals.
1. Could you tell us a little bit about your professional background?
Please see my CV below.
2. What is your role in PSY-PGx?
Co-lead clinical study.
3. Which aspect of your work do you enjoy the most, or you find particularly fascinating?
Interdisciplinary collaboration and sharing scientific, clinical and regulatory issues.
4. In an ideal world, how do you envision mental health care to look like?
A major step towards precision medicine to improve the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for our patients. Low-threshold and equal access to therapy for all social groups. Flexibilization of care, including (additional) digital treatment options.
Curriculum Vitae
Since 2018 Director and W3 Professor of the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn.
Since 2021 Deputy Medical Director of the University Hospital Bonn.
2014-2017 Director and W3 Professor of the Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Karl Jaspers Klinik, European Medical School, Oldenburg-Groningen.
2009-2014 Executive Senior Physician, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg. 2009 Habilitation "on the etiology, symptomatology and therapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults".
1999 Dr. med. "Botulinum toxin A as a new therapy option in neuropaediatrics, University of Freiburg.
Supervisor for cognitive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy.
Scientific focus: translational therapy research on attention and emotion regulation, development and evaluation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for ADHD in adults including digital tools. Precision Medicine.
Clinical focus: diagnosis and treatment of the entire spectrum of mental disorders, especially affective disorders such as depression, stress-associated disorders, ADHD in adulthood and personality disorders, crisis intervention and suicidality.
Scientific advisor of ADHS-Deutschland (https://adhs-deutschland.de/Home.aspx), member of the steering board of the German ADHD Network (www.zentrales-adhs-netz.de). Member of the Advisory Board on Psychotherapy, Germany. Since 2023 President elect, Chairs of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Germany.
1. Could you tell us a little bit about your professional background?
I have a basic education in biochemistry (MSc. Engineering) and medicine (BSc. Medicine). I became docent in Physiological Chemistry 1977, was Lecturer in Physiological Chemistry 1977-1987 and acting Professor of Physiological Chemistry 1987-1996. In 1996 I became a professor in Molecular Toxicology and now I am Section head and research group leader in Pharmacogenetics at the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet since 2006.
I was a member of The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet 2008-2018, have about 520 original papers, 35,556 citations and H-index of 95 in WoS/Clarivate and 55,442 citations and H-index of 123 in Google Scholar. I have been assigned “Highly Cited Researcher” for 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, 2021, 2022 by Thomson & Reuters/Clarivate. Among the Awards are The Svedberg Prize 1999, The ISSX European Scientific Achievement Award 2003; The Bengt Danielsson Prize, The Swedish Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2008; The John G Warner Pfizer Lectureship in Pharmaceutical Sciences, USA, 2011, BCPT Nordic Prize in Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology 2018 and The ISSX RT Williams Scientific Achievement Award 2022.
I have been the main supervisor to a PhD degree for 33 postgraduate students and had postdoctoral training for 35 PhDs. I have a general competence in human genetics, molecular biology, cell biology. Specific competence in pharmacogenomics, drug metabolism, drug induced hepatotoxicity and in vitro models for liver disease. Recently we have published a lot of studies related to better drug psychiatric therapy based on pharmacogenomic knowledge, as summarized in Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2022;43:1055-1069. We are currently making much effort for functional characterization of genetic variants of importance for metabolism of CNS drugs and for identification of the bases for the missing heritability in pharmacogenomics, aimed at improving the genetic prediction of drug metabolism and response in collaboration with e.g., Marin Jukic and Espen Molden.
2. What is your role in PSY-PGx?
I have an advisory role for the project strategy and content with respect to genetic analyses. I am a member of the Management Support Team, a member of the Executive Steering Board, and partner in WP1 where we contribute with knowledge and resources for analyses of new and specific genotypes.
3. Which aspect of your work do you enjoy the most, or you find particularly fascinating?
As I see it innovation and new thinking. The interpretation of the data and believing the data even though they seem to be wrong. In fact, a couple of our biggest discoveries have started with us discarding the data as due to contamination in the sample or as non-specific interactions. But a re-evaluation of the data based on the fact that you can really believe there is something in it resulted in two of the best findings we made. The genetic analyses are nice to work with since explaining variations which cause alteration in the individual's response to a drug or response is of great benefit. Over the years we have been active in the identification of 15 important genetic variants, which now are used as pharmacogenomic biomarkers, including all variants causing ultrarapid metabolism by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. Our problem today is to find the origin of the missing heritability in drug metabolism and transport.
4. In an ideal world, how do you envision mental health care to look like?
I would like mental health care to be much more individualized as compared today. One major issue is the identification of the most important genetic variations influencing response and adverse drug reaction in pharmacotherapy of mental disease. Indeed, recently many high-powered studies and meta analyses indicate that pre-emptive genotyping can improve the antidepressant response to drugs by about 30%, based on different dosing to different patients based on the metabolic phenotypes/genotypes. However, there is still a pronounced interindividual variation in the drug metabolism within each defined genotype/phenotype group and the reasons behind must be elucidated before a true individualized drug treatment can be achieved. This includes to find novel haplotypes and novel types of genes influencing the action, transport and metabolism of drugs in psychiatry, but this also requires an intensified education of physicians and regulators. I think that the PSY-PGx project can indeed put forward harmonization and quality in psychiatric pharmacotherapy and it is my hope that the results can lead to more consensus and power of individually based pharmacogenomic assisted treatment of mental health.
1. Could you tell us a little bit about your professional background?
An MD since 1999 and I obtained my PhD in basic science at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam in 2005. I was offered a postdoc position in Sweden, but decided to go back to the clinics and spend 2,5 years working as Internal Medicine resident, after that I worked 2 years for the Dutch FDA (CBG) registered as a clinical pharmacologist in 2011 and as psychiatrist at the University medical Center in Amsterdam in 2013. My clinical pharmacology residency was partly at a big cancer hospital where pharmacogenetics was applied in colon carcinoma patient (DPYD gene to guide capecitabine treatment). I took this knowledge and started applying it in psychiatric patients since 2013 at the Erasmus medical Center. It turned out to direct towards more appropriate medicines for individual patients in more appropriate dosages and to reduce side effects in psychopharmaca use. Thereupon I took the initiative to develop a national guideline on implementation of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry, that was authorized by the Dutch Psychiatric Association in 2020. Also, I set-up an outpatient clinic on pharmacogenetics in 2017, which I have been running ever since. In 2018 I started working on what is now the PSY-PGx project, which is basically an international out roll of my outpatient clinic in RCT set-up. I am a member of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group, hold research positions at Maastricht University and King’s College UK, have teaching positions at Schola Medica and PsyFar to train psychiatrists and GPs in pharmacogenetics and psychopharmacology and see new patients every week at my outpatient clinic Pharmacogenetics in Amsterdam.
2. What is your role in PSY-PGx?
The initiator and Scientific Coordinator of PSY-PGx, Lead of the Data Management Work Package, Lead of the Project Management Work Package.
3. Which aspect of your work do you enjoy the most, or you find particularly fascinating?
1. Interaction with other people, especially patients but also other care providers and scientific colleagues.
2. Creating better treatments for patients, as we are doing in the PSY-PGx project. Getting everybody on board and having all actively involved is great. It is very similar to making music in a symphony orchestra, as I have been doing for some 40 years now, where I am part of a bigger creative process where every musician has a role and responsibility but the end result is a joint effort.
4. In an ideal world, how do you envision mental health care to look like?
1. More prevention online and in communities for people with non-severe mental disorder before they enter the official psychiatric care systems and trying to prevent them getting worse symptoms
2. Finish treatment when possible, always have a clear treatment plan and evaluation with end of treatment (avoiding people getting dependent on care)
3. If this does not work another round of care, but also focussed and for a set period of time
4. Some patients need longer term care, but we should always strive to seek for opportunities to stop doing what is redundant and it should always be centered around the individual person’s needs
5. More emphasis on quality of life and daily activities, help with work, finances etc if necessary
6. More worldwide collaboration to increase knowledge on etiology of psychiatric disorders and enhance treatment options in general. Large data sets and AI can be of help here
7. More personalized treatment plan from the start, including more personalized treatment options e.g. by PGx guided psychopharmaca treatment and the algorithm that we will set-up
8. No mental health stigma and no stigma on psychopharmaca use
For my particular area, my ambition is to incorporate pharmacogenetics into psychopharmaca use in such a way that we reduce the trial-and-error period by reducing side effects and increase effect of our treatment as doctors around the globe for all patients using antidepressants or antipsychotics.
Of note: In general start of psychopharmaca in non-severe psychiatric disorders should not be advocated, but first focus on psycho-education, bibliography, activation, life style, physical exercise, financial problems etc.
1. Could you tell us a little bit about your professional background?
I have a Masters Degree (M.Eng) in electromechanical engineering by training and relevance experience of more than 25 years as an engineer in mainly R&D projects. Graduated at the University of Leuven and passionate about cars and engines, I started to work in the automotive industry where I spent most of my career. I have held various positions, ranging from an R&D engineer, R&D team manager, instructor of technical and after-sales training and head of R&D and training departments at several European and non-European car manufacturers.
Due to my mental health issues, at one point, few years ago, I chose quality of life over the challenges in a professional career that harmed my health. As a person with lived experience in mental health, I joined GAMIAN-Europe to represent the patients’ perspective in EU funded research projects (mental health related) and to act as liaison between GAMIAN-Europe and its members. I took the opportunity to broaden my experience and expand knowledge in the field of mental health through further training and participation in workshops, steering committees, conferences, seminars etc.
2. What is your role in PSY-PGx?
GAMIAN-Europe as a partner in the consortium is involved in 3 work packages in PSY-PGx: WP1C-the study setup IT, WP2- the ethical, legal and societal issues and WP7-Dissemination and Exploitation. In each of these work packages, we have well-defined tasks to be carried out throughout the project. In order to have some of these jobs done, GAMIAN-Europe has established a (external) Patient Representative Board (PRB) often also called the Patients Advisory Board (PAB). My personal role in PSY-PGx is in the first place the overall project coordination within our organisation, both the operational and financial (reporting) activities. For this, I am supported by my two colleagues of the staff team, the executive director and there where needed, members of the PAB. In addition and linked to this role, I am the chair of the PAB and the liaison between GAMIAN Europe and the PSY-PGx partners who are involved in the above mentioned work packages. No doubt, fulfilling this role of our organisation and my contribution to this is quite a challenge for us.
3. Which aspect of your work do you enjoy the most, or you find particularly fascinating?
Besides my job at GAMIAN Europe, I am Board Member of the patient organisation Ups & Downs in my home country Belgium and also active in various governmental advisory bodies. I enjoy my contacts and projects that are set up with and for my peers on national and European level. For example, the development and publication of guides with recommendations and tips for a good mental health (self)care. But also meetings with professional health carers and public authorities where I can advocate for patients rights against stigma and taboo about mental health or exchange knowledge and experience, do fascinate me a lot. The fact I can do all this work as a self-employed patient expert at my own company ENEA-Ltd, (Experience-Networking-Expertise-Advocacy in Mental Health) brings me much job satisfaction as well as some financial reward, also being a sign of appreciation for the work I do.
4. In an ideal world, how do you envision mental health care to look like?
This is a quite difficult question because in mental health care, there is no perfect world. In that sense, I would say mental health (care) should not strive to perfection, in research nor in treatment. That is why I often ask people : 'What is normal?' What norm do you apply to judge what is abnormal? (translated from Dutch). Do we have to be perfect to meet the standards? Starting from there, 'caring' means to do your best to be comprehensive, to listen and to take enough time to embrace. However nowadays, it is considered as normal not to have time to 'care', this looks for me 'abnormal'.